U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Rhem v. Britain

Rhem v. Britain
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 8, 2001
1 F. App'x 137

Rhem v. Britain

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in their civil action. We have reviewed parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. R & M Envtl, Inc. v. Britain, No. CA-99-99-7 F (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.