Rice v. Parks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Rice v. Parks, 1 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2001)

Rice v. Parks

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, appendix and argument of counsel, we conclude that the District Court did not err in affirming the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court. The latter court’s determination that the settlement agreement between the Trustee and Parks — approved by the bankruptcy court, the validity of which is not open to challenge in this proceeding — intended to exempt the entire property itself, is not clearly erroneous, and it does not appear that the settlement agreement unambiguously provided otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re Herbert B. PARKS, Debtor. Garson L. Rice, Sr., Individually and for and on behalf of R & P Ventures, a General Partnership or Joint Venture, and for and on behalf of Byron Commercial Investments, Incorporated Byron Commercial Investments, Incorporated v. Herbert B. Parks
Status
Published