Brown v. McCormick

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brown v. McCormick, 1 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2001)

Brown v. McCormick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Brown appeals the district court’s order of judgment in her copyright infringement action, and the Defendants cross-appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. McCormick, No. CA-96-3450-L (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Barbara BROWN v. Patricia A. McCORMICK MCA/Universal Merchandising, Incorporated, a/k/a Universal Studios Consumer Products, Incorporated The Patchwork Place, Incorporated The Greenwich Workshop, Incorporated John Simpkins Marketing and Financial Management Enterprises, Incorporated Universal City Studios, Incorporated Amblin' Entertainment, Incorporated, and Weller/Grossman Productions, Incorporated Home and Garden Television, a/k/a HGTV, a subsidiary of the E.W. Scripps Company, Defendants Barbara Brown v. Patricia A. McCormick MCA/Universal Merchandising, Incorporated, a/k/a Universal Studios Consumer Products, Incorporated The Patchwork Place, Incorporated Marketing and Financial Management Enterprises, Incorporated Universal City Studios, Incorporated Amblin' Entertainment, Incorporated, and The Greenwich Workshop, Incorporated John Simpkins Weller/Grossman Productions, Incorporated Home and Garden Television, a/k/a HGTV, a subsidiary of the E.W. Scripps Company
Status
Published