Kuplen v. Hamden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Kuplen v. Hamden, 2 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2001)
Kuplen v. Hamden
Opinion of the Court
John Edward Kuplen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kuplen v. Ham-den, No. CA-00-48-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5 & May 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John Edward KUPLEN v. Michael S. HAMDEN Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Theodis Beck Charles Bullock Finesse G. Couch Gerotha R. Spain Martin McDade G.J. Haynes Michael F. Easley William McBlief Dana Davis James B. Hunt, Jr. Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Judge K. Edward Green John B. Lewis, Jr., Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. John C. Martin Joseph R. John, Sr., Judge Ralph A. Walker Linda M. McGee, Trustee Patricia Timmons Goodson Clarence E. Horton, Jr. Robert C. Hunter Robert H. Edmunds, Jr. Donald L. Smith Jack Cozart Henry E. Frye, Justice Sarah Parker, Justice I. Beverly Lake, Justice Robert Orr Mark D. Martin George L. Wainwright, Jr. John Webb, Justice Willis P. Whichard, Justice Burley Mitchell Gerald Arnold
- Status
- Published