Haley v. Chesapeake's Public School System
Opinion of the Court
William P. Haley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haley v. Chesapeake’s Public School Sys., No. CA-00-520-2 (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 9, 2000; entered Nov. 13, 2000). We deny as moot Haley’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William P. HALEY v. CHESAPEAKE'S PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM Randolph Nichols, Doctor, Superintendent of the Chesapeake Public Schools James S. Gilmore, III, Governor of Virginia Mark L. Earley, Attorney General of Virginia Wilbert Bryant, Virginia's Secretary of Education Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education Commonwealth of Virginia Jo Lynne Demary, State Superintendent of Public Instruction United States of America Bill Clinton, President of the United States of America Richard W. Riley, America's Secretary of Education Janet Reno, Attorney General of America City of Chesapeake, Virginia William Ward, Chesapeake's Mayor Ronald Hallman, Chesapeake City Attorney John L. Pazour, City Manager of Chesapeake, Virginia
- Status
- Published