Armstrong v. Osteen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit September 20, 2001

Armstrong v. Osteen, 20 F. App'x 132 (4th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Arthur O. Armstrong has filed notices of appeals in several district court actions. We have reviewed the records, the relevant district court orders and find the appeals frivolous. Accordingly, we deny *133leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name: In re Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Arthur O. Armstrong v. William L. Osteen, Defendant-Appellee Arthur O. Armstrong v. UC Lending Corporation, Defendant-Appellee Arthur O. Armstrong v. John Doe, Defendant-Appellee Arthur O. Armstrong v. Koury Corporation, and Holiday Inn
Status: Published