Osborn v. Sacchet

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 12, 2001

Osborn v. Sacchet, 20 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Osborn v. Sacchet, No. CA-00-1952-MJG (D. Md. June 15, 2001). We deny Osborn’s motion titled “Request for Time Extension.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*210fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Roger OSBORN v. Joseph P. SACCHET, Warden Maryland State Department of Corrections Maryland State Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services Incorporated Correctional Medical Services Lloyd Waters, Warden Anthony Swetz, Health Services, DPSCS John D. Stafford, Doctor, Medical Director, CMS Alan Graves, Doctor, DDS Harry Heise, Doctor, DDS Doctor Moubarek, Physician, CMS Eleanor Bowles, Ms., Regional Health Care Administrator Robert H. Miller, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, Retired Olin Brake, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, MCI-H, and Robert Testoni, Doctor, DDS
Status: Published