Mazur v. Woodson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Mazur v. Woodson, 21 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2001)

Mazur v. Woodson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mazur v. Woodson, No. CA-01-3-4 (E.D.Va. July 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Paul MAZUR Paul W. Mazur Deborah A. Mazur Silva Walter E. Mazur, Appearing pro se for themselves and on behalf of Betty Dean Woodson Mazur, a mental incompetent, and Victoria M. Mazur v. L.V. WOODSON Circuit Court for the City of Williamsburg and County of James City Judge William Lee Person, Jr. State of Virginia
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published