Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Cordero v. Wilkinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Cordero v. Wilkinson, 22 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2001)

Cordero v. Wilkinson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

John Cordero appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cordero v. Wilkinson, No. CA-01-237-1-17-BD (D.S.C. filed July 26, 2001, & entered July 27, 2001; filed Aug. 6, 2001, & entered Aug. 7, 2001). We deny Cordero’s motion to recuse and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Reference

Full Case Name
John CORDERO v. J. Harvie WILKINSON, III, in his administrative capacity as Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Patricia S. Connor, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit William H. Rehnquist, in his administrative capacity as Chairperson of the Judicial Conference of the United States Judicial Conference of the United States, Defendants-Appellees John Cordero v. J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, in his administrative capacity as Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Patricia S. Connor, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit William H. Rehnquist, in his administrative capacity as Chairperson of the Judicial Conference of the United States Judicial Conference of the United State
Status
Published
↑