U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Smith v. Miro

Smith v. Miro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 15, 2001
23 F. App'x 124

Smith v. Miro

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Smith, Jr., appeals from the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Smith’s civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.