George T. O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying modification of his terms of supervised release. O’Brien’s contention that restrictions to his ability to operate a motor vehicle are unnecessary to protect the public and bear no reasonable relationship to his crime effectively attack the district court’s original sentencing decision, and thus provide no basis for modification. See United States v. Lussier, 104 F.3d 32, 34 (2d Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.