Gray v. Cohen
Gray v. Cohen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1806
EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA; JOEL SILVERMAN, Doctor, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants.
No. 00-2216
EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY; WILLIAM S.
COHEN, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-255-3, CA-99-838-3)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly D. Crawford, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E.
Melson, United States Attorney, Joan E. Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Eugene Gray appeals from the district court’s orders dismiss- ing his employment discrimination and related civil claims. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the opinions of the district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Cohen, No. CA-99-255-3; Gray v. United States Defense Commissary Agency, No. CA-99-838-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2001 & July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.