Harney v. Conroy
Opinion
Daniel Scott Harney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harney v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1008-MJG (D. Md. filed July 18, 2001 & entered July 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Daniel Scott HARNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., the Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished