Brunt v. Taylor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 14, 2002

Brunt v. Taylor, 24 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Brunt appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brunt v. Taylor, No. CA-00-730 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *214 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Reference

Full Case Name: Ronald BRUNT, A/K/A Ronald Brount, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John B. TAYLOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Unpublished