Brunt v. Taylor
Brunt v. Taylor
Opinion
Ronald Brunt appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brunt v. Taylor, No. CA-00-730 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *214 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.