Keirle v. Kupec

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Keirle v. Kupec, 23 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2002)

Keirle v. Kupec

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael R. Keirle seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Keirle v. Rupee, No. CA-00-1010-AW (D.Md. May 14, 2001). Further, we deny Keirle’s motion for additional discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael R. KEIRLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert KUPEC, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished