Cintron v. Beck

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Cintron v. Beck, 22 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2002)

Cintron v. Beck

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Carlo Cintron seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Cintron v. Beck, No. CA-01-158-1 (M.D.N.C. July 17, 2001). We grant Cin-iron’s motion to waive the requirement to file multiple copies of pleadings in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles Carlo CINTRON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Secretary of the N.C. Department of Correction, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished