Francis Nwankwo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Nwankwo v. Warden, No. CA-00-831 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2001); see United States v. White, 238 F.3d 537, 542-43 (4th Cir.) (holding that when there are multiple counts of conviction, statutory maximum sentence on each count may be aggregated to reach the appropriate sentence within the applicable guidelines range), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2235, 150 L.Ed.2d 225 (2001); In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 329-30 (4th Cir. 2000) (explaining applicability of savings clause in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.