U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Williams v. Pearson

Williams v. Pearson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 2002

Williams v. Pearson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7673

BERNARD M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

EDDIE LEE PEARSON, Chief Warden, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-288)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bernard M. Williams appeals the district court’s order that he either pay the entire filing fee or consent to having a certain portion of funds in his prison account forwarded to the district court until the fee is paid. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for general re- lief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.