U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Tilghman v. Galley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 2002 · Traxler, Gregory, Hamilton

26 F. App'x 311

Counsel

Montro Lorell Tilghman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Tilghman v. Galley, Warden (Supreme Court of the United States 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Montro Lorell Tilghman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Tilghman v. Galley, No. CA-00-2568-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2001). We deny Tilghman’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.