Fortune v. Town of Louisa

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Fortune v. Town of Louisa, 26 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2002)

Fortune v. Town of Louisa

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ashland D. Fortune appeals from the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fortune v. Town of Louisa, No. CA-00-42-3 (W.D.Va. July 18 & Aug. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ashland D. FORTUNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF LOUISA; Donald S. Gallihugh; Gregory H. Ferguson; Kimberly Sprouse, the Administratrix of the Estate of Henry Kennon, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished