James Queen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Queen, Nos. CR-98-35-WMN; CA-99-2473-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *140 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.