U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Hall

United States v. Hall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 11, 2002

United States v. Hall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7871

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MARC PIERRE HALL, a/k/a Marc Valeriano, a/k/a Fella, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7893

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MARC PIERRE HALL, a/k/a Marc Valeriano, a/k/a Fella, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-5, CA-99-61-3)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Pierre Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Marc Pierre Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, Nos. CR-95-5; CA-99-61- (W.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.