Richardson v. Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7659

DWIGHT RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. YOUNG, Lieutenant; H. BOWERS, Lieutenant; THOMAS MCINTYRE, Sergeant; PHILLIP KRAUSS, Officer; TIMOTHY STICKLEY, Officer; MARK RALEY, Officer; STANLEY RALEY, Officer; D. COWAN, Officer; TROY HAMILTON, Officer; MARSHA BITTNER, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 2457-L)

Submitted: February 6, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Phillip Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Richardson v. Young, No. CA-00-2457-L (D. Md.

Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished