Lee v. Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
Opinion
Stacy Elizabeth Lee appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of her action for failure to comply with Md. Local R. 106. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Maryland Dep’t of Public Safety & Corr. Servs., No. CA-98-2825-MJG (D.Md. Oct. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Stacy Elizabeth LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee, and William Smith; Quinnie Matthews; Solomon Hejerika; Anthony Osandu; Sergeant Keenan, Patuxent Institution; Stuart O. Sims, Secretary, Division of Corrections, Department of Public Safety and Transportation, State of Maryland, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished