U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Brown v. Thornton

Brown v. Thornton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2002

Brown v. Thornton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1000

FRANK THOMAS BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THEODORE THORNTON; BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 3263-L)

Submitted: February 5, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Thomas Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Brian K. Williams, Assistant General Counsel, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Frank T. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel filed in his employment discrim- ination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.