Timmy Richardson appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. CR-98-290-3 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 12, 2001; entered Dec. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *115 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.