United States v. Abed
United States v. Abed
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8117
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OBADYA HANIFI ABED, a/k/a Beta,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-24, CA-01-356-7)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Obadya Hanifi Abed, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Obadya Hanifi Abed seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Abed, Nos. CR-97-24; CA-
01-356-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2001); see also Tyler v. Cain, U.S.
,
122 S. Ct. 13(2001); United States v. Sanders,
247 F.3d 139(4th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. ,
122 S. Ct. 573(2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished