Nwaneri v. Ashcroft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Nwaneri v. Ashcroft, 30 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2002)

Nwaneri v. Ashcroft

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nwaneri v. Ashcroft, No. CA-01-3059JFM (D. Md. Oct. 22 & Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Chuks Evaristus NWANERI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; Janet Reno, Former U.S. Attorney General; William Barr, Attorney General; Richard D. Bennett, U.S. Attorney; Lynne Ann Battaglia, U.S. Attorney; Robert Harding, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Jan Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Jeff Bielski, D.E.A. Agent, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished