U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Smith v. Miro

Smith v. Miro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 4, 2002 · Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
30 F. App'x 169

Smith v. Miro

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting, in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Miro, No. CA-00-3231-1-20AK (D.S.C. *170 filed Oct. 10, 2001 & entered Oct. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.