U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Roberto v. Bell

Roberto v. Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 4, 2002 · Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
30 F. App'x 166

Roberto v. Bell

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing their civil action against several Maryland state court judges. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. Bell, No. CA-00-1438-AW (D.Md. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.