Putnam v. Kanode
Opinion
Richard Lee Putnam appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Putnam v. Kanode, No. CA-660-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Richard Lee PUTNAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Barry KANODE, O.I.C., Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished