U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Young

United States v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 11, 2002

United States v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RUTHVEN YOUNG, a/k/a Ra Ra, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7777

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ASHBERTH SHERRAN GUERRA, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7806

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DON ANTHONY GUERRA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-445, CA-96-2874-8-2, CA-97-1193-8-2, CA-97-1194-8-2)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ruthven Young, Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Don Anthony Guerra, Appel- lants Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Young, Nos. CR-92-445, CA-96-2874-8-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.