Barr v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Barr v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, 30 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2002)

Barr v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Barr appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barr v. South Carolina Dep’t of Probation, Parole & Pardon Servs., No. CA-01-3175-2-22 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 12, 2001, entered Sept. 14, 2001; and filed Feb. 7, 2002, entered Feb. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Vincent BARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES; Curtis Keels, Agent of SCDPPPS; Steven Benjamin, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished