Lancaster v. Monette
Opinion
Jeffrey D. Lancaster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lancaster v. Monette, No. CA-99-481-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jeffrey D. LANCASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry MONETTE; Nancy Tootle; Frank Henderson; John Potter; John Doe; James Doe; Jim Doe; Bob Doe; Robert Doe; Larry Norman; Linda Blount; Craven County Commissioners; Bonnie Doe; Willey Doe; George Doe; Bobby Doe, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished