U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Hill v. Pitt-Ohio Express, Inc.

Hill v. Pitt-Ohio Express, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 2002 · Niemeyer, King, Hamilton
30 F. App'x 311

Hill v. Pitt-Ohio Express, Inc.

Opinion

*312 PER CURIAM.

Cecil Alan Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his wrongful termination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Pitt-Ohio Express, Inc., No. CA-00-1219 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.