David Lee Goode appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Goode’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Goode v. Coffeewood Corr. Ctr., No. CA-00-675-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *302 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.