United States v. Vengoechea
United States v. Vengoechea
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6120
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
REGINA VENGOECHEA, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-99-98, CA-01-3832)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Regina Vengoechea, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Regina Vengoechea appeals from the district court’s order giving her notice, under Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), that the Government had moved to summarily dismiss her motion for a reduction of sentence. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order giving Vengoechea Roseboro notice is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.