William Lee Richardson, Jr., seeks to appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Richardson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, No. CA-01-504-2 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *286 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.