Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to correct illegal sentence and remit fine.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jupiter, No. CR-93-4-H (W.D.Va. Nov. 19, 2001). We deny Jupiter’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.