Nicholas J. Queen appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which the district court properly construed as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Queen, No. CR-93-366 (D.Md. Jan. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.