U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Cooper

United States v. Cooper
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2002

United States v. Cooper

Opinion

Filed: April 18, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7924 (CR-92-108)

United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

Juanita Walker Cooper, Defendant - Appellant.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed March 28, 2002, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the lower court information is corrected to begin “Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.”

On page 2, line 6 -- “S.D.W.Va.” is corrected to read “D.S.C.” For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JUANITA WALKER COOPER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-108)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juanita Walker Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Juanita Walker Cooper appeals from the district court’s order denying her motions to modify her term of imprisonment and to dismiss the indictment and her conviction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cooper, No. CR-92-108 (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.