Ramona Mason appeals the district court’s order enforcing the employment *93 discrimination settlement agreement between Mason and Sprint PCS. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mason v. Sprint PCS, No. CA-00-515-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.