Jones v. US Marshals
Jones v. US Marshals
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2428
SAMMIE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-2429
SAMMIE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF ALEXANDRA LIBRARY; KERRY J. DONLEY, Major, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-62-MC, CA-01-63-MC) Submitted: April 19, 2002 Decided: May 1, 2002
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sammie Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Sammie Jones appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil actions as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. United States, Nos. CA-01-62-MC; CA-01-63-MC (E.D. Va., filed Sept. 5, 2001; entered Nov. 21 & 23, 2001).
Additionally, while we grant Jones’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to subpoena the court reporter, as well as his “Petition for Review,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.