U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Wilder v. Catoe

Wilder v. Catoe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2002

Wilder v. Catoe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6397

SAMUEL A. WILDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DOUG CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-00-3257)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel A. Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Samuel A. Wilder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. Catoe, No. CA-00- 3257 (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2002). We further deny Wilder’s motion for a preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.