Jessie Royster appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Royster v. NHP Management Co., No. CA-00-290-L (D.Md. Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.