United States v. Butler
United States v. Butler
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6584
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6585
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6595
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6625
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6780
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-7065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-44)
Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: May 14, 2002
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: James A. Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), his motion for reconsideration, and various preliminary motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Butler, No. CR-91-44 (E.D.
Va. Mar. 9 & 29, 2001 & Apr. 27, 2001). We also deny Butler’s motion to supplement the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.