Woodfin v. Angelone
Woodfin v. Angelone
Opinion
Kenneth Wayne Woodfin appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 *375 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Woodfin v. Angelone, No. CA-01-444 (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.