Terrence Agnew seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * See Agnew v. Garraghty, No. CA-01-1743-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.