U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Sudharmi v. Sadeq

Sudharmi v. Sadeq
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 11, 2002 · Niemeyer, Williams, Hamilton
36 F. App'x 514

Sudharmi v. Sadeq

Opinion

*515 PER curiam:.

Haitham S. Sadeq and Rola A. Sabbagh appeal the magistrate judge’s order awarding judgment in favor of Appellee in this action filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act. * We have reviewed the magistrate judge’s opinion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Sudharmi v. Sadeq, No. CA-00-1451A (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.